Vetsuisse-Fakultät​ (Veterinärmedizin)

Vetsuisse-Fakultät​ (Veterinärmedizin)

Crafting fundable proposals: A team approach to grant writing

Getting funding is tough! A new initiative where departmental staff members provide input for their colleagues' grants got off to a great start.

by Mike Toscano

I have organized a grant writing and development course aimed at PhD students and early postdocs who are keen to gain grant-writing experience. However, they have questions regarding how to get started and what to be included. The course involves an exercise where participants submit a two-page research proposal that is then circulated to two members of the class for review. The student reviewers (i.e., not the author) present the idea and their evaluation using a standard evaluation template.


«Grant writing can be a lonely business. Sharing the experience was empowering, and identifying 'muddy' aspects of the proposal before submission definitely increases everyone’s chances for funding. Fingers crossed!»

Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser

From this discussion, the first Vetsuisse grant review was held with five participants reviewing four grants. As in the class, grants were presented by the lead reviewer with a second reviewer contributing. In the discussion where one member who did not read the research proposal beforehand, the actual author was excluded but she/he could listen to the entire discussion. Even though my grant got torn to shreds by my colleagues, the discussion was exactly what I needed to see how my ideas were not being communicated. Based on the positive feedback from participants, we agreed that this was the first, but definitely not last session. Plans were made for a second round in February 2025 so please watch this space and look for the announcement!


«Grant writing and review are often seen as daunting tasks, but when approached as a collaborative effort, they can become productive and enjoyable. Engaging in group sessions not only lightens the workload but also fosters a supportive environment, making the process a valuable learning experience, especially for young scientists.»

When presenting, the author of the proposal is in the room but can’t interact with the others. The course gets positive reviews from participants who are surprised that their ideas which seemed so clear during writing are so difficult to understand by others. Although I lead the course, I have learned so much seeing how great ideas can get lost and strategies for presenting complicated ideas. Following the discussion with Vetsuisse colleagues, I wondered if our faculty could benefit as well? Beyond the benefit of getting honest and open feedback from fellow scientists leading to a better grant, we also learn about research activities in our departments and opportunities for collaboration.

«Excellent initiative that improved team building in our faculty, and a great opportunity to learn more about the interesting research of my colleagues. It was an eye-opener regarding issues in my grant that were obvious to me, but not to others.»

Meike Mevissen


«I found the workshop to be an effective teambuilding event for faculty members, offering valuable insights into ongoing projects within the faculty. The feedback from colleagues, providing an external perspective, was particularly helpful in identifying areas for improvement.»

Anna Oeverman

 

 

Vetsuisse-News

This article originally appeared in VetsuisseNews 2/24.

read the complete issue